The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 19:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Nice genealogical article which would be welcome at Ancestry.com. The only possible basis for keeping it that I can see would be if his scholarly hobby made him a notable author, but just doing some research and apparently publishing it via vanity press does not satisfy
WP:BIO. Possibly his library could make him notable, but where are the reliable secondary sources?
Edison (
talk) 17:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Insufficient coverage in reliable third party sources.
Aditya (
talk) 17:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 19:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Nice genealogical article which would be welcome at Ancestry.com. The only possible basis for keeping it that I can see would be if his scholarly hobby made him a notable author, but just doing some research and apparently publishing it via vanity press does not satisfy
WP:BIO. Possibly his library could make him notable, but where are the reliable secondary sources?
Edison (
talk) 17:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - Insufficient coverage in reliable third party sources.
Aditya (
talk) 17:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.