- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The topic appears to satisfy WP:GEOLAND requirements. Thanks for the detective work, y'all. Joyous! | Talk 01:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Liciada, Bustos ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. The barangay is not that notable. Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 04:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs sourcing for WP:V, which seems to be available from cursory googling. But from my understanding of WP:GEOLAND, even the tiniest populated areas (including barangays/villages) have inherent notability, as long as they are legally recognized.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 10:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Problem is, if barangay is being used colloquially -- as the article says may be the case -- then this could be a neighbourhood rather than a legally recognized place, in which case WP:GEOLAND states the notability is not inherent. I'm not casting a !vote, just pointing this out. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 20:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 20:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's official. It has its own elected administration (a barangay captain and councilors). It's also listed as one of the 14 barangays of the municipality of Bustos in the official website of the Province of Bulacan.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 16:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also tangentially: to clarify, a "neighborhood" is actually also usually legally recognized in the Philippines, as barangays are usually that in dense urban areas (instead of discrete villages). That said, some "neighborhoods", like gated communities, suburbs, or housing projects can be informally referred to as "barangay", despite not having a separate local government.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 17:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete per nom. VegasCasinoKid ( talk) 10:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sockpuppet— UY Scuti Talk 14:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)- Keep. As a legally recognized place (thanks Obsidian Soul for confirming this), this subject plainly satisfies WP:GEOLAND standards. Antepenultimate ( talk) 01:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The topic appears to satisfy WP:GEOLAND requirements. Thanks for the detective work, y'all. Joyous! | Talk 01:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Liciada, Bustos ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. The barangay is not that notable. Nickrds09 (Talk to me) 04:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs sourcing for WP:V, which seems to be available from cursory googling. But from my understanding of WP:GEOLAND, even the tiniest populated areas (including barangays/villages) have inherent notability, as long as they are legally recognized.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 10:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Problem is, if barangay is being used colloquially -- as the article says may be the case -- then this could be a neighbourhood rather than a legally recognized place, in which case WP:GEOLAND states the notability is not inherent. I'm not casting a !vote, just pointing this out. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 20:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 20:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 20:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's official. It has its own elected administration (a barangay captain and councilors). It's also listed as one of the 14 barangays of the municipality of Bustos in the official website of the Province of Bulacan.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 16:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also tangentially: to clarify, a "neighborhood" is actually also usually legally recognized in the Philippines, as barangays are usually that in dense urban areas (instead of discrete villages). That said, some "neighborhoods", like gated communities, suburbs, or housing projects can be informally referred to as "barangay", despite not having a separate local government.-- OBSIDIAN† SOUL 17:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 08:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete per nom. VegasCasinoKid ( talk) 10:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Blocked sockpuppet— UY Scuti Talk 14:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)- Keep. As a legally recognized place (thanks Obsidian Soul for confirming this), this subject plainly satisfies WP:GEOLAND standards. Antepenultimate ( talk) 01:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.