The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Add-on that fails
WP:PRODUCT -- article doesn't even describe what it is beyond being an add-on. Was tagged PROD back in 2012, but the tag was removed when a couple links were added to the Liberty BASIC website. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 19:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The TUCOWS link is a download site, and these are not typically considered independent. In any case, 1 brief review is not enough to establish notability, and a search turned up no additional RS coverage, just more download sites and incidental mentions.
Dialectric (
talk) 06:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as this essentially too soon at best. This was actually tagged for speedy but that user is now no longer active but
GB fan changed it to a PROD until it was removed.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Add-on that fails
WP:PRODUCT -- article doesn't even describe what it is beyond being an add-on. Was tagged PROD back in 2012, but the tag was removed when a couple links were added to the Liberty BASIC website. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 19:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The TUCOWS link is a download site, and these are not typically considered independent. In any case, 1 brief review is not enough to establish notability, and a search turned up no additional RS coverage, just more download sites and incidental mentions.
Dialectric (
talk) 06:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as this essentially too soon at best. This was actually tagged for speedy but that user is now no longer active but
GB fan changed it to a PROD until it was removed.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.