The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 04:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)reply
COI article. I'd have speedied it but technically it asserts notability (youtube comments and ratings, please). It is clear from reading it that the series has not received any coverage in reliable, independent sources.
Drat (
Talk) 14:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 04:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)reply
COI article. I'd have speedied it but technically it asserts notability (youtube comments and ratings, please). It is clear from reading it that the series has not received any coverage in reliable, independent sources.
Drat (
Talk) 14:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.