The result was keep for now. General consensus seems to be that there's a good chance this could be well sourced, though some research is necessary due to the time period involved. This result should not be taken as a precedent against renominating this in a month or two if no such verifiable sources have been found. ~ mazca talk 22:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply
not clear how this person is notable. Lacks significant coverage in verifiable 3rd party sources, fails WP:BIO RadioFan ( talk) 11:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now. General consensus seems to be that there's a good chance this could be well sourced, though some research is necessary due to the time period involved. This result should not be taken as a precedent against renominating this in a month or two if no such verifiable sources have been found. ~ mazca talk 22:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply
not clear how this person is notable. Lacks significant coverage in verifiable 3rd party sources, fails WP:BIO RadioFan ( talk) 11:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC) reply