From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lexus w/o prejudice to any merge provided that material taken from the article is properly sourced. The article history will remain accessible at the redirect page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Lexus India (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page when the information on that page could - and likely should - be merged into the main article about the brand. I made an error in originally accepting this article at AfC, assuming good faith that substantial information existed to make the article notable upon its own merits. I no longer believe that to be the case. (edit) In my opinion, Lexus India fails COMPANY, with "no inherent notability". Strikerforce Talk 17:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lexus w/o prejudice to any merge provided that material taken from the article is properly sourced. The article history will remain accessible at the redirect page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Lexus India (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page when the information on that page could - and likely should - be merged into the main article about the brand. I made an error in originally accepting this article at AfC, assuming good faith that substantial information existed to make the article notable upon its own merits. I no longer believe that to be the case. (edit) In my opinion, Lexus India fails COMPANY, with "no inherent notability". Strikerforce Talk 17:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook