The result was speedy close; malformed nomination. No prejudice against speedy re-nomination done correctly. Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 15:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete: From wikipedia's guidelines for notable artists:
Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:
1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. 3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. 4. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. 5. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics
Warrenking ( talk) 22:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Blogs do not meet the standards of Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. From the Uptown Almanac website: "Uptown Almanac is basically a crappy blog about San Francisco culture and general bullshit." Warrenking ( talk) 19:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Warrenking ( talk) 18:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close; malformed nomination. No prejudice against speedy re-nomination done correctly. Non-admin closure. — KuyaBriBri Talk 15:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete: From wikipedia's guidelines for notable artists:
Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals:
1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. 3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. 4. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. 5. See Wikipedia:Notability (academics) for guidelines on academics
Warrenking ( talk) 22:24, 15 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Blogs do not meet the standards of Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. From the Uptown Almanac website: "Uptown Almanac is basically a crappy blog about San Francisco culture and general bullshit." Warrenking ( talk) 19:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Warrenking ( talk) 18:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC) reply