The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The article is about the street and the tram stop and the stand at Hillsborough. This broad topic is therefore notable, passes the
WP:GNG and so should be kept. Deletion would not be sensible because its title is the
common name of all these aspects and so making it a red link would be disruptive and unhelpful to our readers. See also
WP:ATD;
WP:BEFORE;
WP:NOTPAPER;
WP:PRESERVE; &c.
Andrew D. (
talk)
12:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing particularly noteworthy about the street, the stand and tram stop are named the same because of were they physically are, not because the street is of any note. The tram stop doesnt appear to be of any particularly note either but this shouldnt be used as a parking slot because it or the stand cant sustain an article. If they were of any note then this could be a dab page but a redirect to
Hillsborough Stadium might be worth looking at.
MilborneOne (
talk)
12:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm torn between a redirect to Hillsborough Stadium (lots of coverage, but all about the stadium) and a weak keep, since the etymology is sourced.
SportingFlyerT·C20:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Existence of an etymology isn't grounds for notability; would a generic "Oak Street" be notable just for being sourced that oak trees were nearby? The quoted citation is not remotely substantive coverage about this street. The stops (not stations) on the tram are not notable for being a stop (other stops link to the district or nearby landmark). It does not make sense to combine an article for both the non-notable street and non-notable stands that are nearby anyway, and that's covered in the stadium article (the north stand and south stand are likewise not notable). A redirect would be fine though.
Reywas92Talk23:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep The article is about the street and the tram stop and the stand at Hillsborough. This broad topic is therefore notable, passes the
WP:GNG and so should be kept. Deletion would not be sensible because its title is the
common name of all these aspects and so making it a red link would be disruptive and unhelpful to our readers. See also
WP:ATD;
WP:BEFORE;
WP:NOTPAPER;
WP:PRESERVE; &c.
Andrew D. (
talk)
12:09, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing particularly noteworthy about the street, the stand and tram stop are named the same because of were they physically are, not because the street is of any note. The tram stop doesnt appear to be of any particularly note either but this shouldnt be used as a parking slot because it or the stand cant sustain an article. If they were of any note then this could be a dab page but a redirect to
Hillsborough Stadium might be worth looking at.
MilborneOne (
talk)
12:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment I'm torn between a redirect to Hillsborough Stadium (lots of coverage, but all about the stadium) and a weak keep, since the etymology is sourced.
SportingFlyerT·C20:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Existence of an etymology isn't grounds for notability; would a generic "Oak Street" be notable just for being sourced that oak trees were nearby? The quoted citation is not remotely substantive coverage about this street. The stops (not stations) on the tram are not notable for being a stop (other stops link to the district or nearby landmark). It does not make sense to combine an article for both the non-notable street and non-notable stands that are nearby anyway, and that's covered in the stadium article (the north stand and south stand are likewise not notable). A redirect would be fine though.
Reywas92Talk23:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.