The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable as an actress in her own right, just minor roles in her father's films. Notability is not inherited. --
woodensuperman 10:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - Notability established per roles in notable films. That she might have gotten her roles via her father is irrelevant. WP:GNG.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BabbaQ (
talk •
contribs) 19:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
WP:NACTOR calls for "significant roles in multiple notable films". None of her roles are significant. --
woodensuperman 07:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment With having such a famous father, and in lieu of finding anything outside of that, then this should be redirected to
Ingmar Bergman#Marriages and children in his article as a possible search term. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 17:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Being an extra while having a famous father is enough to get an article on this project? Really? This is an obvious case of
WP:NOTINHERITED. This actress also fails
WP:NACTOR as, being an extra, none of her roles were "significant." --
Millionsandbillions (
talk) 18:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing she has done makes her notable, does not become notable because of notable parents.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable as an actress in her own right, just minor roles in her father's films. Notability is not inherited. --
woodensuperman 10:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - Notability established per roles in notable films. That she might have gotten her roles via her father is irrelevant. WP:GNG.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BabbaQ (
talk •
contribs) 19:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
WP:NACTOR calls for "significant roles in multiple notable films". None of her roles are significant. --
woodensuperman 07:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment With having such a famous father, and in lieu of finding anything outside of that, then this should be redirected to
Ingmar Bergman#Marriages and children in his article as a possible search term. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 17:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Being an extra while having a famous father is enough to get an article on this project? Really? This is an obvious case of
WP:NOTINHERITED. This actress also fails
WP:NACTOR as, being an extra, none of her roles were "significant." --
Millionsandbillions (
talk) 18:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing she has done makes her notable, does not become notable because of notable parents.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 04:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.