From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Laurel Hills, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a true neighborhood but merely a real-estate subdivision. All the articles about it are promotional. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I noticed there was an open Merger discussion going on, that has had no participation in a month. I was initially going to suggest the article go ahead and be merged per that, however, looking into sources, it would appear that the nominator is correct. This is not a true neighborhood, and there are no reliable sources even mentioning it that I can find. There is definitely a small street named "Laurel Hills" in the area, but I am finding nothing aside from mirrors of this article that denote it as a notable neighborhood. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 19:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Laurel Hills, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a true neighborhood but merely a real-estate subdivision. All the articles about it are promotional. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 14:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I noticed there was an open Merger discussion going on, that has had no participation in a month. I was initially going to suggest the article go ahead and be merged per that, however, looking into sources, it would appear that the nominator is correct. This is not a true neighborhood, and there are no reliable sources even mentioning it that I can find. There is definitely a small street named "Laurel Hills" in the area, but I am finding nothing aside from mirrors of this article that denote it as a notable neighborhood. Rorshacma ( talk) 15:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 19:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook