- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Laura Jane Laughlin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Laura Jane Laughlin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject does not pass WP:NACTOR. There simply isn't reliable coverage on her. Kbabej ( talk) 18:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kbabej ( talk) 18:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Kbabej ( talk) 18:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. @ Kbabej: Am I right in thinking that you created this BLP? thanks. Britishfinance ( talk) 18:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @ Britishfinance:. Yes, I was the one who originally created the article when I was a new WP user. As other editors have edited and contributed to the page, I didn't think it was eligible for WP:G7. I could be wrong on that count, though. As it stands, I do not believe the subjects meets WP:NACTOR or GNG. -- Kbabej ( talk) 20:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Small minor roles. Britishfinance ( talk) 15:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not a single role of her's is a significant one (recurring ones or in not notable movies), making Laura fail WP:NACTOR, and on WP:GNG front it is equally as bad, with no significant coverage present in searches nor in the article (passing mentions or listings). Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Laura Jane Laughlin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Laura Jane Laughlin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject does not pass WP:NACTOR. There simply isn't reliable coverage on her. Kbabej ( talk) 18:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kbabej ( talk) 18:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Kbabej ( talk) 18:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. @ Kbabej: Am I right in thinking that you created this BLP? thanks. Britishfinance ( talk) 18:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @ Britishfinance:. Yes, I was the one who originally created the article when I was a new WP user. As other editors have edited and contributed to the page, I didn't think it was eligible for WP:G7. I could be wrong on that count, though. As it stands, I do not believe the subjects meets WP:NACTOR or GNG. -- Kbabej ( talk) 20:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Small minor roles. Britishfinance ( talk) 15:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not a single role of her's is a significant one (recurring ones or in not notable movies), making Laura fail WP:NACTOR, and on WP:GNG front it is equally as bad, with no significant coverage present in searches nor in the article (passing mentions or listings). Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 22:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.