The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
there is nothing to these relations except lack of recognition, which means that any interactions between the 2 countries are very limited.
LibStar (
talk)
03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Actually quite interesting, Latvia was a short time the only country to have a diplomatic relationship with taiwan and china. Enough sources for WP:GNG: [
[1][2][3]
Keep Lack of recognition some time may generate more interest than friendly relation relationship.
The source in the article and those pointed above will surely meet GNG. –
Ammarpad (
talk)
10:50, 2 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
there is nothing to these relations except lack of recognition, which means that any interactions between the 2 countries are very limited.
LibStar (
talk)
03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Actually quite interesting, Latvia was a short time the only country to have a diplomatic relationship with taiwan and china. Enough sources for WP:GNG: [
[1][2][3]
Keep Lack of recognition some time may generate more interest than friendly relation relationship.
The source in the article and those pointed above will surely meet GNG. –
Ammarpad (
talk)
10:50, 2 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.