The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. This person has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore meets the
general notability guideline. And as an archery speed world record holder, he is apparently notable per se. --
Neo-Jay (
talk)
00:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Although his speed is not officially recognized by the Guinness World Records, it has been widely reported by independent sources. And Lars Andersen has also received significant public attention for his other archery skills. That's why I think that he meets the
general notability guideline. --
Neo-Jay (
talk)
03:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. He is known first and foremost for being a fast archer, which is abundantly demonstrated in sources that go well beyond that single fact, and the article easily meets
WP:GNG/
WP:BASIC. Perhaps nom would care to read the Danish sources as well, an alternative {{Find sources AFD}} has been provided. The nomination makes the bare claim that subject is not notable (
WP:Not notable) and says "Only really known for his self-promotion on YouTube", but I don't see sources mention that it is "self-promotion" that he is known for. SamSailor15:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. This person has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and therefore meets the
general notability guideline. And as an archery speed world record holder, he is apparently notable per se. --
Neo-Jay (
talk)
00:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Although his speed is not officially recognized by the Guinness World Records, it has been widely reported by independent sources. And Lars Andersen has also received significant public attention for his other archery skills. That's why I think that he meets the
general notability guideline. --
Neo-Jay (
talk)
03:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. He is known first and foremost for being a fast archer, which is abundantly demonstrated in sources that go well beyond that single fact, and the article easily meets
WP:GNG/
WP:BASIC. Perhaps nom would care to read the Danish sources as well, an alternative {{Find sources AFD}} has been provided. The nomination makes the bare claim that subject is not notable (
WP:Not notable) and says "Only really known for his self-promotion on YouTube", but I don't see sources mention that it is "self-promotion" that he is known for. SamSailor15:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.