The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 18:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable London property estate Polyamorph ( talk) 19:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I refer everyone to helpful comments on the talkpage [1] Legacypac ( talk) 17:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
One case in point: the neighbouring estate of /info/en/?search=Derwent_London has a similar footprint/value/impact. The Derwent wiki has been in place since 2008 and has not be challenged in this way. The same applies to the similarly aged entry for Langham's other neighbour /info/en/?search=Shaftesbury_plc. It would be nice to see equitable treatment.
Langham Estate is similarly one of the largest holdings in /info/en/?search=Fitzrovia and the 16th largest in London -- it lies next to /info/en/?search=Oxford_Street (with some of the most valuable real estate in the UK). The Langham Estate is worth GBP 100s of millions , has been in existence for about a century and its activities have had an outsized impact on the economy and the lives of thousands in this section of London.
The article lists numerous references and they substantiate (notability: verifiable secondary sources over a sufficiently significant period of time) what has been written in the text. Its references are verifiable and come from reputable and independent sources (University College London Bartlett School of Architecture, The Independent, Financial Times, Evening Standard, Sunday Times, and a number of books... etc.). The fact that SOME of the articles might lie behind paywalls for /info/en/?search=User:Rosguill does not mean the reference material is not there. If necessary the references can and will be revised to show hard copy reference sources -- but then what would that change? I took much time to carefully justify everything I wrote in this text.
Let me know. I am sorry you think this article unsuitable.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 18:25, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable London property estate Polyamorph ( talk) 19:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I refer everyone to helpful comments on the talkpage [1] Legacypac ( talk) 17:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
One case in point: the neighbouring estate of /info/en/?search=Derwent_London has a similar footprint/value/impact. The Derwent wiki has been in place since 2008 and has not be challenged in this way. The same applies to the similarly aged entry for Langham's other neighbour /info/en/?search=Shaftesbury_plc. It would be nice to see equitable treatment.
Langham Estate is similarly one of the largest holdings in /info/en/?search=Fitzrovia and the 16th largest in London -- it lies next to /info/en/?search=Oxford_Street (with some of the most valuable real estate in the UK). The Langham Estate is worth GBP 100s of millions , has been in existence for about a century and its activities have had an outsized impact on the economy and the lives of thousands in this section of London.
The article lists numerous references and they substantiate (notability: verifiable secondary sources over a sufficiently significant period of time) what has been written in the text. Its references are verifiable and come from reputable and independent sources (University College London Bartlett School of Architecture, The Independent, Financial Times, Evening Standard, Sunday Times, and a number of books... etc.). The fact that SOME of the articles might lie behind paywalls for /info/en/?search=User:Rosguill does not mean the reference material is not there. If necessary the references can and will be revised to show hard copy reference sources -- but then what would that change? I took much time to carefully justify everything I wrote in this text.
Let me know. I am sorry you think this article unsuitable.