The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I resolved the issue. The article has sources that cite examples in Poland, Australia, and Switzerland. The tag is no longer valid, which is why I removed it after addressing the issue.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk)
16:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep/procedural keep nothing has changed since your last
AFD nomination of this article just less than a month ago (which I was not involved in). The fact that two editors decided to remove content instead of using sources found in the last AFD isn't a basis for deletion. Looking in ebsco and ProQuest, that didn't seem to have been found in the last AFD:
Comment I have rebuilt the article with three sources discussing lane sharing. Shame on you, Chidgk1, for nominating this for deletion a second time despite knowing sources existed and were freely available. I lean more towards a "deletionist" perspective at AfD, but even I am appalled at your behavior here.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk)
15:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per criteria 2.c: The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption and, since questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination, no uninvolved editor has recommended deletion or redirection as an outcome of the discussion. For example: making nominations of the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
JumpytooTalk19:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I resolved the issue. The article has sources that cite examples in Poland, Australia, and Switzerland. The tag is no longer valid, which is why I removed it after addressing the issue.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk)
16:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep/procedural keep nothing has changed since your last
AFD nomination of this article just less than a month ago (which I was not involved in). The fact that two editors decided to remove content instead of using sources found in the last AFD isn't a basis for deletion. Looking in ebsco and ProQuest, that didn't seem to have been found in the last AFD:
Comment I have rebuilt the article with three sources discussing lane sharing. Shame on you, Chidgk1, for nominating this for deletion a second time despite knowing sources existed and were freely available. I lean more towards a "deletionist" perspective at AfD, but even I am appalled at your behavior here.
Trainsandotherthings (
talk)
15:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per criteria 2.c: The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption and, since questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination, no uninvolved editor has recommended deletion or redirection as an outcome of the discussion. For example: making nominations of the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
JumpytooTalk19:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.