The result was keep. The promotional nature of the original article has been tempered, and independent sourcing has been added. Accordingly, the keep position is better supported by the end state of this article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Purely promotional article. Most of the refs are mere mentions or inclusions in a general article. The others are based on PR. The award is not notable, or reliable as an indication of merit. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speiron for an AfD already in process the equally promotional article on the equally non-notable company. Personally, I consider this G11 territory ,but there was an opinion in the other AfD that the product article was justified, so it needs a discussion. DGG ( talk ) 06:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The promotional nature of the original article has been tempered, and independent sourcing has been added. Accordingly, the keep position is better supported by the end state of this article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Purely promotional article. Most of the refs are mere mentions or inclusions in a general article. The others are based on PR. The award is not notable, or reliable as an indication of merit. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speiron for an AfD already in process the equally promotional article on the equally non-notable company. Personally, I consider this G11 territory ,but there was an opinion in the other AfD that the product article was justified, so it needs a discussion. DGG ( talk ) 06:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC) reply