The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Citations are extremely lacking. Caucus lacks any real notable sources beyond its founding, and even those are minimal. ToaNidhiki05 15:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Easily passes
WP:GNG, as you would expect from congressional caucus of this size:
[1][2][3] The nominator seems to be looking just at the references cited in the article.
StAnselm (
talk) 16:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Snow Keep, needs more references, but passes GNG.
Rylesbourne (
talk) 15:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep A Caucus which holds 114 seats, the fact that this was nominated for deletion at all is ridiculous, and probably by some "anti-woke" Republican. *Face-Palm* — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DailyJew (
talk •
contribs) 06:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Citations are extremely lacking. Caucus lacks any real notable sources beyond its founding, and even those are minimal. ToaNidhiki05 15:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Easily passes
WP:GNG, as you would expect from congressional caucus of this size:
[1][2][3] The nominator seems to be looking just at the references cited in the article.
StAnselm (
talk) 16:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Snow Keep, needs more references, but passes GNG.
Rylesbourne (
talk) 15:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep A Caucus which holds 114 seats, the fact that this was nominated for deletion at all is ridiculous, and probably by some "anti-woke" Republican. *Face-Palm* — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DailyJew (
talk •
contribs) 06:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.