The result was delete. -- Ezeu 18:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable student-run television station. Tom Harrison Talk 17:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply
why has LUST been classed as non-notable but none of these NaSTA Bloomsbury Television CTV (Bath) Demon TV GlamTV Glasgow University Student Television LSUTV Stoic tv Warwick TV Winstanley TV YSTV
I disagree i think its important to have these articles, as many people use wikipedia as there first reference. isn't the point of wikipedia to try collect everything anyone could ever want to know for everyone to access? or is it only for Americans, as i find many american articles unnotable like the fact it seems every secondary school in american has an article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:High_schools_in_Colorado) how are these more notable? (Capt Jack Doicy)
I don't think any of them should be deleted, i'm using them as Precedents particularly to show that if this was page about an american tv station it would not have been nominated for deletion. I apologise for any mistakes i've made in the formatting of this defence, and thank you for the links as it lead me to this, "Licensed radio and TV stations are notable if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." WP:AFDP Student TV and Radio, is based on original content, broadcasts it and has to be licensed to do so. on these grounds LUST and all student TV in the UK fulfills the criteria for notability. unless of course all articles are equal but American one are more equal than others. (Capt Jack Doicy)
The result was delete. -- Ezeu 18:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable student-run television station. Tom Harrison Talk 17:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply
why has LUST been classed as non-notable but none of these NaSTA Bloomsbury Television CTV (Bath) Demon TV GlamTV Glasgow University Student Television LSUTV Stoic tv Warwick TV Winstanley TV YSTV
I disagree i think its important to have these articles, as many people use wikipedia as there first reference. isn't the point of wikipedia to try collect everything anyone could ever want to know for everyone to access? or is it only for Americans, as i find many american articles unnotable like the fact it seems every secondary school in american has an article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:High_schools_in_Colorado) how are these more notable? (Capt Jack Doicy)
I don't think any of them should be deleted, i'm using them as Precedents particularly to show that if this was page about an american tv station it would not have been nominated for deletion. I apologise for any mistakes i've made in the formatting of this defence, and thank you for the links as it lead me to this, "Licensed radio and TV stations are notable if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." WP:AFDP Student TV and Radio, is based on original content, broadcasts it and has to be licensed to do so. on these grounds LUST and all student TV in the UK fulfills the criteria for notability. unless of course all articles are equal but American one are more equal than others. (Capt Jack Doicy)