- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 22:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- L.A. Screenings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of significance and third party references available. Itsalleasy ( talk) 02:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The L.A. Screenings are one of the principal markets for the international television industry, along with MIPCOM, MIPTV, and NATPE. There are numerous reliable sources about this annual event in reliable sources. A HighBeam search, for example, yields more than 400 articles. [1] Some examples of sources that provide basic background: [2] [3] [4] The article could stand some serious editing (no need to list all the market participants, for example), but the subject's notability is established. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 06:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Arxiloxos; international equivalent of the American domestic network upfront presentations. Nate • ( chatter) 07:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NRVE and WP:GNG. Topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than sourcing within articles. The source examples provided above by User:Arxiloxos demonstrates that this topic passes WP:GNG. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 22:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- L.A. Screenings ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of significance and third party references available. Itsalleasy ( talk) 02:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The L.A. Screenings are one of the principal markets for the international television industry, along with MIPCOM, MIPTV, and NATPE. There are numerous reliable sources about this annual event in reliable sources. A HighBeam search, for example, yields more than 400 articles. [1] Some examples of sources that provide basic background: [2] [3] [4] The article could stand some serious editing (no need to list all the market participants, for example), but the subject's notability is established. -- Arxiloxos ( talk) 06:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Arxiloxos; international equivalent of the American domestic network upfront presentations. Nate • ( chatter) 07:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:NRVE and WP:GNG. Topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than sourcing within articles. The source examples provided above by User:Arxiloxos demonstrates that this topic passes WP:GNG. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.