The result was keep. The book cited in the article is not a RS for the existence of the beast, but it is for the existence of the meme, and enough else has been found, eg mention in guidebooks. JohnCD ( talk) 11:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has been listed as lacking any citations for over two years, and it contains no evidence of notability. I can find no evidence of notability in a brief google search. The material seems likely to constitute non-notable original research. Locke9k ( talk) 20:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The book cited in the article is not a RS for the existence of the beast, but it is for the existence of the meme, and enough else has been found, eg mention in guidebooks. JohnCD ( talk) 11:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has been listed as lacking any citations for over two years, and it contains no evidence of notability. I can find no evidence of notability in a brief google search. The material seems likely to constitute non-notable original research. Locke9k ( talk) 20:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC) reply