The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:V, GNG, GEOLAND. The tribal name is Kunud (Singular Kindi) but it's a tribal name, not a settlement or recognised area or region. And even then, this is spelled incorrectly and full of unsourced information general to the whole East Coast of the UAE.
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
08:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:V. This is totally unsourced, except for a vague assertion that it's in a book, with no details. More disturbing is the assertion that this might be just a typo (or, more probably, alternate transliteration) of
Kunud. Looking at the two articles, I have no way to prove or disprove the assertion. For an encyclopedia which holds
WP:V above all else, that's a serious problem. --
RoySmith(talk)22:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:V, GNG, GEOLAND. The tribal name is Kunud (Singular Kindi) but it's a tribal name, not a settlement or recognised area or region. And even then, this is spelled incorrectly and full of unsourced information general to the whole East Coast of the UAE.
Alexandermcnabb (
talk)
08:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:V. This is totally unsourced, except for a vague assertion that it's in a book, with no details. More disturbing is the assertion that this might be just a typo (or, more probably, alternate transliteration) of
Kunud. Looking at the two articles, I have no way to prove or disprove the assertion. For an encyclopedia which holds
WP:V above all else, that's a serious problem. --
RoySmith(talk)22:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.