From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sistema. Sandstein 16:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Kronstadt Group

Kronstadt Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I attempted to let this incubate in draftspace, but it was moved back out. Zero justification for a standalone stub article separate from its parent company Sistema. Any coverage seems to be trivial or routine, per WP:CORPDEPTH; mostly just shallow coverage of weapon contracts/announcements/releases that are akin to press releases. There's some very modest coverage in military blogs and sources with limited audience WP:AUD. There is two Newsweek articles where the CEO is quoted, and other articles that parrot those quotes and then a national post article that gives a one line shoutout to them, but no real coverage of the company, at least nothing that would pass the rigorous standard of WP:NCORP. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete nothing there at all, certainly doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. Mztourist ( talk) 06:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep- Article doesn't need to be immediately very long. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 13:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Merge into Sistema. Subsidiaries are better covered in the parent co. article. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 02:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sistema. Sandstein 16:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Kronstadt Group

Kronstadt Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I attempted to let this incubate in draftspace, but it was moved back out. Zero justification for a standalone stub article separate from its parent company Sistema. Any coverage seems to be trivial or routine, per WP:CORPDEPTH; mostly just shallow coverage of weapon contracts/announcements/releases that are akin to press releases. There's some very modest coverage in military blogs and sources with limited audience WP:AUD. There is two Newsweek articles where the CEO is quoted, and other articles that parrot those quotes and then a national post article that gives a one line shoutout to them, but no real coverage of the company, at least nothing that would pass the rigorous standard of WP:NCORP. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:08, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Delete nothing there at all, certainly doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. Mztourist ( talk) 06:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Keep- Article doesn't need to be immediately very long. Oranjelo100 ( talk) 13:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Merge into Sistema. Subsidiaries are better covered in the parent co. article. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 02:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook