The result was redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3). MBisanz talk 12:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:ALLPLOT and no established notability of this particular episode. Frietjes ( talk) 14:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3): As far as Reception information goes, I've been able to find a short paragraph [1] about the episode on That Guy with the Glasses. A discussion was started about this website at the RSN here - Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 167#Video review shows - and while no one ever replied, the OP made a decent argument for the site's reliability. I also found a couple paragraphs in this [2] article on geekbinge.com, which seems like a well-put-together website. They have pretty big "staff", editorial oversight, etc. - see here [3] Whether any of the people running the site are professionals though, is more than I could say. I'm leaning in favor of redirecting this for now. That way the history can be saved in case anyone wants to recreate it later. For the time being though, I don't feel like we have quite enough coverage of this episode. Then again, maybe I'm being too dismissive of the two sources that I found. Let me know what you all think about them. -- Jpcase ( talk) 02:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3). MBisanz talk 12:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:ALLPLOT and no established notability of this particular episode. Frietjes ( talk) 14:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants (season 3): As far as Reception information goes, I've been able to find a short paragraph [1] about the episode on That Guy with the Glasses. A discussion was started about this website at the RSN here - Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 167#Video review shows - and while no one ever replied, the OP made a decent argument for the site's reliability. I also found a couple paragraphs in this [2] article on geekbinge.com, which seems like a well-put-together website. They have pretty big "staff", editorial oversight, etc. - see here [3] Whether any of the people running the site are professionals though, is more than I could say. I'm leaning in favor of redirecting this for now. That way the history can be saved in case anyone wants to recreate it later. For the time being though, I don't feel like we have quite enough coverage of this episode. Then again, maybe I'm being too dismissive of the two sources that I found. Let me know what you all think about them. -- Jpcase ( talk) 02:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)