The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 08:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I am unable to verify this. As best as I can determine, the original source is GEONames or some predecessor to it, as I find a 1962 listing which matches these coordinates. Given that there are no seconds given, this is way too imprecise to identify with a map or aerial feature. Other hits seem to be false or clickbait. I'm inexperienced in dealing with Pakistani locations, so I'm not sure what official resources can be brought to bear, but if someone can point them out, or better still update the article, I'd be happy to withdraw this, but the imprecision of the coordinates is already a bad sign. Mangoe ( talk) 03:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 08:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I am unable to verify this. As best as I can determine, the original source is GEONames or some predecessor to it, as I find a 1962 listing which matches these coordinates. Given that there are no seconds given, this is way too imprecise to identify with a map or aerial feature. Other hits seem to be false or clickbait. I'm inexperienced in dealing with Pakistani locations, so I'm not sure what official resources can be brought to bear, but if someone can point them out, or better still update the article, I'd be happy to withdraw this, but the imprecision of the coordinates is already a bad sign. Mangoe ( talk) 03:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)