The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Closing as Keep. Editors can discuss a possible page move on the article talk page. That's an editing decision. LizRead!Talk!01:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)reply
[1] Korfballers vechten hard voor hun club 'De Kapellen' wacht op plek in Schenkel-Oost. "Het vrije volk : democratisch-socialistisch dagblad". Rotterdam, 27-03-1980, p. 5. Geraadpleegd op Delpher op 19-06-2024,
https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ddd:010960497:mpeg21:p047
[2] Hans de Kwant: Door en doorgezond' 'De Bermen speelt korfbal met visie' Van onze medewerker ANDRé KOUWENHOVEN. "Het vrije volk : democratisch-socialistisch dagblad". Rotterdam, 11-09-1980, p. 5. Geraadpleegd op Delpher op 19-06-2024,
https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ddd:010960654:mpeg21:p031
[3] Timmers, Jan (4 December 2023). "
KCC/CK Kozijnen belandt in zwaar weer". Het Kontakt IJssel en Lekstreek. Kontakt Media Partners. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
The newer sources are not yet included in the national archives. Among the very recent news sources, the article by Jan Timmers stands out as it contains analysis. Note that the merger itself occurred in the coverage lull so we will need to do with these fine sources before and after.
gidonb (
talk)
01:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I have added even more SIGCOV. All in the article. Note that there are also a few sources, including the original one, that only support data.
gidonb (
talk)
15:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. That's full-page coverage in those 1980s papers. We've got just enough for GNG in the articles brought forth by Gidonb, but given the first two articles I'm confident there's also much more out there that we just haven't found yet. --
asilvering (
talk)
18:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Absolutely! The merger falls into the website to archive lull. A lot of the information that we remove on Wikipedia does. The sources above and in the article prove beyond any doubt that there is no case for deletion. As the delete sayers do not deal with the sources, their opinions fall under the category of
WP:IDONTLIKEIT and bad research.
gidonb (
talk)
19:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Yeah, the new sources have more than convinced me the article should be kept. Didn't see the AfD got relisted for so long, but I'm ready to vote keep given the added material. However, I wouldn't call it "bad research", as
WP:BEFORE (what I did before nomination) isn't required to be fully exhaustive, although I don't deny your research was great!
Chaotic Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
20:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks! The article is in much, much better shape than when I first nominated it. I trust you with the name, although you should be able to move the page yourself as there is no preexisting article there.
Chaotic Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Closing as Keep. Editors can discuss a possible page move on the article talk page. That's an editing decision. LizRead!Talk!01:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)reply
[1] Korfballers vechten hard voor hun club 'De Kapellen' wacht op plek in Schenkel-Oost. "Het vrije volk : democratisch-socialistisch dagblad". Rotterdam, 27-03-1980, p. 5. Geraadpleegd op Delpher op 19-06-2024,
https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ddd:010960497:mpeg21:p047
[2] Hans de Kwant: Door en doorgezond' 'De Bermen speelt korfbal met visie' Van onze medewerker ANDRé KOUWENHOVEN. "Het vrije volk : democratisch-socialistisch dagblad". Rotterdam, 11-09-1980, p. 5. Geraadpleegd op Delpher op 19-06-2024,
https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=ddd:010960654:mpeg21:p031
[3] Timmers, Jan (4 December 2023). "
KCC/CK Kozijnen belandt in zwaar weer". Het Kontakt IJssel en Lekstreek. Kontakt Media Partners. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
The newer sources are not yet included in the national archives. Among the very recent news sources, the article by Jan Timmers stands out as it contains analysis. Note that the merger itself occurred in the coverage lull so we will need to do with these fine sources before and after.
gidonb (
talk)
01:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I have added even more SIGCOV. All in the article. Note that there are also a few sources, including the original one, that only support data.
gidonb (
talk)
15:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. That's full-page coverage in those 1980s papers. We've got just enough for GNG in the articles brought forth by Gidonb, but given the first two articles I'm confident there's also much more out there that we just haven't found yet. --
asilvering (
talk)
18:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Absolutely! The merger falls into the website to archive lull. A lot of the information that we remove on Wikipedia does. The sources above and in the article prove beyond any doubt that there is no case for deletion. As the delete sayers do not deal with the sources, their opinions fall under the category of
WP:IDONTLIKEIT and bad research.
gidonb (
talk)
19:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Yeah, the new sources have more than convinced me the article should be kept. Didn't see the AfD got relisted for so long, but I'm ready to vote keep given the added material. However, I wouldn't call it "bad research", as
WP:BEFORE (what I did before nomination) isn't required to be fully exhaustive, although I don't deny your research was great!
Chaotic Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
20:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks! The article is in much, much better shape than when I first nominated it. I trust you with the name, although you should be able to move the page yourself as there is no preexisting article there.
Chaotic Enby (
talk ·
contribs)
21:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.