- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural close because there is nothing in Wikipedia guidelines about allowing an AfD from more than a decade ago to be reopened. If desired, bring up for a new AfD using the proper process (with understanding a lot about this article may have changed in 10 years). SouthernNights ( talk) 13:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Korbel Champagne Cellars ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As a representative of Korbel Champagne Cellars I am respectfully requesting the deletion of the Korbel Champagne Cellars page. The writer of the page insists on calling our product sparkling wine. However, our legal corporate name is F. Korbel & Bros., Inc. Our legal property name is Korbel Champagne Cellars. Our legal product name through our trademark is Korbel California Champagne. The writer references the law in the article but continues to call our product sparkling wine. I change it to the legal name and the writer changes it back. We would rather not appear on Wikipedia if our correct and legal name is not used. What legal right does the writer have to change the name of our product? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bythelake ( talk • contribs) 20:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and California. Shellwood ( talk) 09:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp× g 10:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep: The issue motivating this AfD request has been solved, and as far as I know it isn't a valid rationale for deletion anyway. However, I can't find a lot of reliable secondary sources which are not just passing mentions (so far I have only found this one [1]). BilletsMauves ( talk) 11:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural close because there is nothing in Wikipedia guidelines about allowing an AfD from more than a decade ago to be reopened. If desired, bring up for a new AfD using the proper process (with understanding a lot about this article may have changed in 10 years). SouthernNights ( talk) 13:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Korbel Champagne Cellars ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As a representative of Korbel Champagne Cellars I am respectfully requesting the deletion of the Korbel Champagne Cellars page. The writer of the page insists on calling our product sparkling wine. However, our legal corporate name is F. Korbel & Bros., Inc. Our legal property name is Korbel Champagne Cellars. Our legal product name through our trademark is Korbel California Champagne. The writer references the law in the article but continues to call our product sparkling wine. I change it to the legal name and the writer changes it back. We would rather not appear on Wikipedia if our correct and legal name is not used. What legal right does the writer have to change the name of our product? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bythelake ( talk • contribs) 20:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and California. Shellwood ( talk) 09:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp× g 10:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep: The issue motivating this AfD request has been solved, and as far as I know it isn't a valid rationale for deletion anyway. However, I can't find a lot of reliable secondary sources which are not just passing mentions (so far I have only found this one [1]). BilletsMauves ( talk) 11:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.