The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 00:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Porn performer. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 13:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
There are no notable Japanese awards, so use of WP:PORNBIO criteria 1/2 seem unfair to compare against countries which do have awards. He has been mentioned in three notable mainstream gay media (Fridae, Badi, G-men). He has been mentioned four times in Queerclick, which is more than most American porn stars get mentioned in a Japanese porn blog. In my opinion, he has made a notable and novel contribution to Japanese porn; indeed Badi have led with him in two consecutive features. What else can a Japanese porn star do to deserve an article? Dan88888 ( talk) 13:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
GNG: Significant coverage given main subject of one Badi magazine. Badi and Fridae are both Reliable, secondary Sources, Independent of the subject. While I agree the PORNBIO citeria as currently written are worthy of debate, I can't see your point around GNG. Please clarify. Dan88888 ( talk) 14:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 00:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Porn performer. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 13:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
There are no notable Japanese awards, so use of WP:PORNBIO criteria 1/2 seem unfair to compare against countries which do have awards. He has been mentioned in three notable mainstream gay media (Fridae, Badi, G-men). He has been mentioned four times in Queerclick, which is more than most American porn stars get mentioned in a Japanese porn blog. In my opinion, he has made a notable and novel contribution to Japanese porn; indeed Badi have led with him in two consecutive features. What else can a Japanese porn star do to deserve an article? Dan88888 ( talk) 13:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply
GNG: Significant coverage given main subject of one Badi magazine. Badi and Fridae are both Reliable, secondary Sources, Independent of the subject. While I agree the PORNBIO citeria as currently written are worthy of debate, I can't see your point around GNG. Please clarify. Dan88888 ( talk) 14:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply