- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Killowen Primary School (Coleraine)
- Killowen Primary School (Coleraine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN primary school. I cannot see any special indicia of notability; in such circumstances, we generally do not keep such articles as stand-alone articles. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No assertion of notability has been made through references, both of which are irrelevant in terms of notability; one being a listing of the school on a website dedicated to listing schools, and the other being an 'inspection report' that is a dead link for me. Regardless of that, an inspection report has no sway on the notability of an article. Therefore, it fails WP:GNG. Flipandflopped (Discuss, Contribs) 04:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board per common practice described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No independent source found to judge notability as per WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. The given sources seem to be irrelevant. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 07:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to
ColeraineNorth Eastern Education and Library Board per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey2010 • (talk) 21:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC) - Redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board per common practice described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.-- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most extraordinary primary schools are presumed non-notable. Carrite ( talk) 16:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 11:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Killowen Primary School (Coleraine)
- Killowen Primary School (Coleraine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN primary school. I cannot see any special indicia of notability; in such circumstances, we generally do not keep such articles as stand-alone articles. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - No assertion of notability has been made through references, both of which are irrelevant in terms of notability; one being a listing of the school on a website dedicated to listing schools, and the other being an 'inspection report' that is a dead link for me. Regardless of that, an inspection report has no sway on the notability of an article. Therefore, it fails WP:GNG. Flipandflopped (Discuss, Contribs) 04:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board per common practice described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No independent source found to judge notability as per WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. The given sources seem to be irrelevant. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 07:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to
ColeraineNorth Eastern Education and Library Board per SCHOOLOUTCOMES. – Davey2010 • (talk) 21:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC) - Redirect to North Eastern Education and Library Board per common practice described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.-- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect per longstanding consensus at AfD that all but the most extraordinary primary schools are presumed non-notable. Carrite ( talk) 16:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.