From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Kikori Whiskey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this product meets the WP:GNG. Antrocent ( ♫♬) 18:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - The article itself seems deceptive. According to this, it's not even whiskey but shochu. The alcohol might be made in Japan (though from an undisclosed source apparently), but the company--and I presume the mix—is American. The article thus smells of being an advertisement. There are a few reviews on the net in English, but I can't find anything in Japanese. This is not enough to pass WP:GNG. Michitaro ( talk) 01:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree with Michitaro - this isn't whiskey, but aged shochu, as it is made from rice through the use of koji mold (to break down the starches to sugars for fermentation) rather than barley, corn (maize), rye or wheat, which are malted to produce the sugars for fermentation in true whiskeys. Further, there are insufficient mentions in secondary sources to establish notability in general. Geoff | Who, me? 21:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as too soon for any solid applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 01:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC) reply

Kikori Whiskey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this product meets the WP:GNG. Antrocent ( ♫♬) 18:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - The article itself seems deceptive. According to this, it's not even whiskey but shochu. The alcohol might be made in Japan (though from an undisclosed source apparently), but the company--and I presume the mix—is American. The article thus smells of being an advertisement. There are a few reviews on the net in English, but I can't find anything in Japanese. This is not enough to pass WP:GNG. Michitaro ( talk) 01:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Agree with Michitaro - this isn't whiskey, but aged shochu, as it is made from rice through the use of koji mold (to break down the starches to sugars for fermentation) rather than barley, corn (maize), rye or wheat, which are malted to produce the sugars for fermentation in true whiskeys. Further, there are insufficient mentions in secondary sources to establish notability in general. Geoff | Who, me? 21:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as too soon for any solid applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook