- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article, as Oakshade points out, is almost a one-to-one duplicate of Khyber train safari. There appear to be no sources that would support a redirect of the page in question to Khyber train safari. A Train talk 14:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Khyber Steam Safari
- Khyber Steam Safari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The proposed train fails WP:GNG and the article is an example of WP:CRYSTAL. I have only found one relevant source but even that only discusses using the engines that once was part of the Khyber Steam Safari (also called the Khyber train safari). From the source we can see that there appears to be no track to Landi Kotal, and that the proposal is a "proposal is to take a business venture ... into consideration" which to me make it sounds like it's in the very early planning stages. Add to that that there are no sources in the article that supports that there is any proposed tourist train. What sources there are refer to the Khyber train safari that stopped running ten years ago. Sjö ( talk) 10:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Khyber train safari. This was an operating train so obviously CRYSTAL doesn't apply. However this new venture is only a proposal. The propose re-use content can be in the target article. -- Oakshade ( talk) 22:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, fails GNG, CORP. No reliable sources cover this topic, and especially since there is no solid evidence that this going to happen it appears to be WP:OR. Fails WP:V - no reliable sources to indicate notability. I do not agree with merge, due to lack of sourcing and WP:OR. Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 21:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 23:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as everything listed here has been about one thing and that's about the plans, and it seems these plans have been considered for some time, but there's nothing actually established yet, therefore Delete as there's no article if nothing is confirmed. SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, I basically agree with all the entry's above.— JJBers Public ( talk) 17:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJBers Public ( talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The article, as Oakshade points out, is almost a one-to-one duplicate of Khyber train safari. There appear to be no sources that would support a redirect of the page in question to Khyber train safari. A Train talk 14:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Khyber Steam Safari
- Khyber Steam Safari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The proposed train fails WP:GNG and the article is an example of WP:CRYSTAL. I have only found one relevant source but even that only discusses using the engines that once was part of the Khyber Steam Safari (also called the Khyber train safari). From the source we can see that there appears to be no track to Landi Kotal, and that the proposal is a "proposal is to take a business venture ... into consideration" which to me make it sounds like it's in the very early planning stages. Add to that that there are no sources in the article that supports that there is any proposed tourist train. What sources there are refer to the Khyber train safari that stopped running ten years ago. Sjö ( talk) 10:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Khyber train safari. This was an operating train so obviously CRYSTAL doesn't apply. However this new venture is only a proposal. The propose re-use content can be in the target article. -- Oakshade ( talk) 22:16, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, fails GNG, CORP. No reliable sources cover this topic, and especially since there is no solid evidence that this going to happen it appears to be WP:OR. Fails WP:V - no reliable sources to indicate notability. I do not agree with merge, due to lack of sourcing and WP:OR. Steve Quinn ( talk) 05:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 21:36, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 23:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as everything listed here has been about one thing and that's about the plans, and it seems these plans have been considered for some time, but there's nothing actually established yet, therefore Delete as there's no article if nothing is confirmed. SwisterTwister talk 20:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, I basically agree with all the entry's above.— JJBers Public ( talk) 17:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJBers Public ( talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.