The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable village, possibly even a hoax. The name appears on Google Maps (possibly based on this article), alongside an alleged village called Khonda Kandi. Satellite View does not place the names at the nearest settlements.
Delete. It was originally
https://www.geonames.org/13232 (probably based on an entry in
GEOnet Names Server). That ID is now
Mesdaraq (formerly 13521) but "Khodā Kandī" is still there under "alternate names". If it is the same place, a better source is needed to confirm, but it means there is (or was) a (possibly populated) place with this name (or a similar name) at that location (or somewhere else), which is enough to say it is not a hoax, but not enough for an article.
Peter James (
talk)
18:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable village, possibly even a hoax. The name appears on Google Maps (possibly based on this article), alongside an alleged village called Khonda Kandi. Satellite View does not place the names at the nearest settlements.
Delete. It was originally
https://www.geonames.org/13232 (probably based on an entry in
GEOnet Names Server). That ID is now
Mesdaraq (formerly 13521) but "Khodā Kandī" is still there under "alternate names". If it is the same place, a better source is needed to confirm, but it means there is (or was) a (possibly populated) place with this name (or a similar name) at that location (or somewhere else), which is enough to say it is not a hoax, but not enough for an article.
Peter James (
talk)
18:06, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.