- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 07:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- KeyCDN ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Typical promotional spam. Forgot that WP is not an advertising medium. Winged Blades Godric 12:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like spam. Especially since the editor who created the page has been editing other articles to add links to keycdn.com. -- ChiveFungi ( talk) 14:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep While the article incorporates promotional aspects, I would say it is salvageable. A more concerning problem is that it may not meet WP:GNG: I was only able to find one independent source -- Hazarasp ( talk) 14:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a service provider that is actually "a service of proinity, LLC.. Of the 6 references 4 are from the subject of the article. Builtwith, that the article shows lists the company as 4th, does not verify this that I can see. It actually, with a chart and listing, shows the company lower ranked. Datanyze shows the company with a 4.4% market share having dropped 12,084 websites, as 5th "out of 52 Content Delivery Networks technologies in Datanyze Universe" and 7th in the United States according to the same "universe". There needs to be more coverage than the company advertisement or "Datanyze Universe" or "Built with". I could find KeyCDN info from the company but not on a search. In the worldwide scheme of life it is a tiny company, with no notability for encyclopedia coverage, and mainly self-sourced that does make it an advertisement article. Otr500 ( talk) 09:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Also, while Hazarasp mentioned the madlemmings.com article as an independent source, it is actually from a blog post and therefore fails as a recognizable source and fails the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 15:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 07:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- KeyCDN ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Typical promotional spam. Forgot that WP is not an advertising medium. Winged Blades Godric 12:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like spam. Especially since the editor who created the page has been editing other articles to add links to keycdn.com. -- ChiveFungi ( talk) 14:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep While the article incorporates promotional aspects, I would say it is salvageable. A more concerning problem is that it may not meet WP:GNG: I was only able to find one independent source -- Hazarasp ( talk) 14:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a service provider that is actually "a service of proinity, LLC.. Of the 6 references 4 are from the subject of the article. Builtwith, that the article shows lists the company as 4th, does not verify this that I can see. It actually, with a chart and listing, shows the company lower ranked. Datanyze shows the company with a 4.4% market share having dropped 12,084 websites, as 5th "out of 52 Content Delivery Networks technologies in Datanyze Universe" and 7th in the United States according to the same "universe". There needs to be more coverage than the company advertisement or "Datanyze Universe" or "Built with". I could find KeyCDN info from the company but not on a search. In the worldwide scheme of life it is a tiny company, with no notability for encyclopedia coverage, and mainly self-sourced that does make it an advertisement article. Otr500 ( talk) 09:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 10:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Also, while Hazarasp mentioned the madlemmings.com article as an independent source, it is actually from a blog post and therefore fails as a recognizable source and fails the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 15:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.