- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Kevrette Brown ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable low-level college football player who has not yet played in the NFL, CFL or AFL. References in the article do not talk about him, much less do they give him significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. Article seems to be written by someone close to him as well. JTtheOG ( talk) 14:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Doesn't meet notability standards, but there's plenty of external sources here. Not a bad article, but it's hard to make the case for notability. South Nashua ( talk) 14:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not finding the sort of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources as needed to satisfy WP:GNG. If he actually makes it in the CFL, the article would then pass WP:NGRIDIRON, but we're not there yet. Cbl62 ( talk) 00:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame ( talk) 00:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for football players, which are very broad as it is. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Kevrette Brown ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable low-level college football player who has not yet played in the NFL, CFL or AFL. References in the article do not talk about him, much less do they give him significant coverage needed for WP:GNG. Article seems to be written by someone close to him as well. JTtheOG ( talk) 14:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Doesn't meet notability standards, but there's plenty of external sources here. Not a bad article, but it's hard to make the case for notability. South Nashua ( talk) 14:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not finding the sort of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources as needed to satisfy WP:GNG. If he actually makes it in the CFL, the article would then pass WP:NGRIDIRON, but we're not there yet. Cbl62 ( talk) 00:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame ( talk) 00:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for football players, which are very broad as it is. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.