The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Erik9 ( talk) 00:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable blogger. After a quick search on google, google news and google books, I wasn't able to find anything to suggest that he meets WP:BIO. Bob A ( talk) 16:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems to me that you have no conception of anarchist intellectual debate and discussion. This single person has revived the philosophy of mutualism. There are many obscure philosophies and philosophers on wikipedia. There is nobody else in anarchism contributing as much to individualist anarchism as Carson. In fact, there isn't much of anything being put out for individualist anarchism of the classical variety at least. I really don't understand the argument that JLS isn't notable. Where do you draw the line? It is a journal put together by fairly well known libertarians. George Reisman's attack should also make him notable. Put in a search for mutualism in google and Carson's on the first page. Citizen Anarch ( talk) 10:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Erik9 ( talk) 00:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Non-notable blogger. After a quick search on google, google news and google books, I wasn't able to find anything to suggest that he meets WP:BIO. Bob A ( talk) 16:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC) reply
It seems to me that you have no conception of anarchist intellectual debate and discussion. This single person has revived the philosophy of mutualism. There are many obscure philosophies and philosophers on wikipedia. There is nobody else in anarchism contributing as much to individualist anarchism as Carson. In fact, there isn't much of anything being put out for individualist anarchism of the classical variety at least. I really don't understand the argument that JLS isn't notable. Where do you draw the line? It is a journal put together by fairly well known libertarians. George Reisman's attack should also make him notable. Put in a search for mutualism in google and Carson's on the first page. Citizen Anarch ( talk) 10:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply