The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as this is another case of geographic locations almost always being kept (NAC).
SwisterTwistertalk 04:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply
DeleteKeroa Union and
Keroa as non-notable union in Bangladesh. The article was created without any sources and contains only OR text. Google search turns up nothing for "Keroa" or "Keroa Union" but minor info (i.e. prayer times). No official website for the community and nothing to indicate relevance.
Quis separabit? 14:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)reply
There is clearly a link in the article pointing to government portal. -- nafSadhdidsay 22:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep a citation to the official web site has been provided in the article, it has a number of sub-pages, all in Bengali. It is not just a village, it is the administrative center for a number of villages which are divided into nine or ten wards (sources conflict). Generally under the
WP:Notability (geographic features) guidelines such places are kept. Populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low. I also added the census citation. --
Bejnar (
talk) 05:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Perhaps I should point out that the population is over 30,000. Keroa Union is mentioned in recent Bengali language news stories, but
WP:NOTNEWS. --
Bejnar (
talk) 02:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as this is another case of geographic locations almost always being kept (NAC).
SwisterTwistertalk 04:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply
DeleteKeroa Union and
Keroa as non-notable union in Bangladesh. The article was created without any sources and contains only OR text. Google search turns up nothing for "Keroa" or "Keroa Union" but minor info (i.e. prayer times). No official website for the community and nothing to indicate relevance.
Quis separabit? 14:35, 3 October 2015 (UTC)reply
There is clearly a link in the article pointing to government portal. -- nafSadhdidsay 22:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep a citation to the official web site has been provided in the article, it has a number of sub-pages, all in Bengali. It is not just a village, it is the administrative center for a number of villages which are divided into nine or ten wards (sources conflict). Generally under the
WP:Notability (geographic features) guidelines such places are kept. Populated, legally recognized places are typically considered notable, even if their population is very low. I also added the census citation. --
Bejnar (
talk) 05:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Perhaps I should point out that the population is over 30,000. Keroa Union is mentioned in recent Bengali language news stories, but
WP:NOTNEWS. --
Bejnar (
talk) 02:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.