The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Two previous afds closed without consensus but recent discussions have solidified that technical sng passes cannot take priority over failing to pass the gng, in this case neither award passes pornbio and the sourcing is clearly sub gng worthy. Press releases and promotional interviews do not gng make.
SpartazHumbug!20:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as a BLP lacking in reliable independents sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sources listed are iafd, promotional profile at Wicked Pictures, award materials, or interviews -- none are suitable for establishing notability. Awards listed are not significant and well known.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
03:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete and here's to hoping we can be third time lucky!, Hasn't won any notable awards and nothing remotely reliable on Google, most sources are promotional and nothing more, Fails PORNBIO #1, #2 and #3 aswell as GNG. –
Davey2010Talk01:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Two previous afds closed without consensus but recent discussions have solidified that technical sng passes cannot take priority over failing to pass the gng, in this case neither award passes pornbio and the sourcing is clearly sub gng worthy. Press releases and promotional interviews do not gng make.
SpartazHumbug!20:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as a BLP lacking in reliable independents sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sources listed are iafd, promotional profile at Wicked Pictures, award materials, or interviews -- none are suitable for establishing notability. Awards listed are not significant and well known.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
03:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete and here's to hoping we can be third time lucky!, Hasn't won any notable awards and nothing remotely reliable on Google, most sources are promotional and nothing more, Fails PORNBIO #1, #2 and #3 aswell as GNG. –
Davey2010Talk01:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.