The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of notability. The article itself states "Rogal has performed mostly in supporting roles". The roles include even unnamed characters, such as Hooker, Prostitute, Bartender, and Papergirl. Source #1 is fine. Sources #2 and #3 are interviews, so not RS. Sources #4, #5, and #6 are mentions. There isn't enough here to justify a WP article.
Kbabej (
talk)
16:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I was able to find some newspaper coverage that she got in her home state of Pennsylvania.
1,
2 Not familiar with her work, so won't be voting for now.
GoldenAgeFan1 (
talk)
17:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep: This is, in my opinion, a borderline case. The sources identified above help make an argument for
WP:GNG. As for
WP:NACTOR, the subject's role in the play, Muckrakers, is significant, yet all other roles are supporting, at best. Therefore, I think a "Weak Keep" is the best I can do in the circumstances.
Dflaw4 (
talk)
04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of notability. The article itself states "Rogal has performed mostly in supporting roles". The roles include even unnamed characters, such as Hooker, Prostitute, Bartender, and Papergirl. Source #1 is fine. Sources #2 and #3 are interviews, so not RS. Sources #4, #5, and #6 are mentions. There isn't enough here to justify a WP article.
Kbabej (
talk)
16:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment I was able to find some newspaper coverage that she got in her home state of Pennsylvania.
1,
2 Not familiar with her work, so won't be voting for now.
GoldenAgeFan1 (
talk)
17:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep: This is, in my opinion, a borderline case. The sources identified above help make an argument for
WP:GNG. As for
WP:NACTOR, the subject's role in the play, Muckrakers, is significant, yet all other roles are supporting, at best. Therefore, I think a "Weak Keep" is the best I can do in the circumstances.
Dflaw4 (
talk)
04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.