The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
KeepSources exist Sufficient sources exist to base an article on. I don't have access to all the sources, but AGF, I take it that Wright96, for example, is about the subject, and provides more than a passing mention.
Mduvekot (
talk)
01:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete unless sources are included in the article, the claim that they exist is not enough to keep the article. Especially since "sources exist" in no way gaurantees that they are reliable, 3rd party secondary sources that give substantive coverage.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
03:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Johnpacklambert, sources never need to be included in the article if we are evaluating it for notability standards at AfD. We need only show that they exist at all, see
WP:NEXIST. Best practice would be to add found sources to the article, or lacking the time/inclination to do so, link them in the AfD discussion. If we haven't found any sources when doing
WP:BEFORE, then absolutely, we can say the article should be deleted since no RS have turned up. Am I misreading that you are assuming there are no RS or are you sure there are none?
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
17:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - not sure where anyone else was looking. Travels in the US and Australia produced interviews and other sources about her.
JarrahTree08:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There are plenty of reliable sources (which I added to the article). In addition, searching under "Kartika Affandi" reveals more results than her full name. There are several sources in Indonesian.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
18:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
KeepSources exist Sufficient sources exist to base an article on. I don't have access to all the sources, but AGF, I take it that Wright96, for example, is about the subject, and provides more than a passing mention.
Mduvekot (
talk)
01:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete unless sources are included in the article, the claim that they exist is not enough to keep the article. Especially since "sources exist" in no way gaurantees that they are reliable, 3rd party secondary sources that give substantive coverage.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
03:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Johnpacklambert, sources never need to be included in the article if we are evaluating it for notability standards at AfD. We need only show that they exist at all, see
WP:NEXIST. Best practice would be to add found sources to the article, or lacking the time/inclination to do so, link them in the AfD discussion. If we haven't found any sources when doing
WP:BEFORE, then absolutely, we can say the article should be deleted since no RS have turned up. Am I misreading that you are assuming there are no RS or are you sure there are none?
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
17:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - not sure where anyone else was looking. Travels in the US and Australia produced interviews and other sources about her.
JarrahTree08:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There are plenty of reliable sources (which I added to the article). In addition, searching under "Kartika Affandi" reveals more results than her full name. There are several sources in Indonesian.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
18:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.