From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Kartika Affandi-Koberl (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. From what I've found, most RS only mention subject in passing. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sources exist Sufficient sources exist to base an article on. I don't have access to all the sources, but AGF, I take it that Wright96, for example, is about the subject, and provides more than a passing mention. Mduvekot ( talk) 01:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless sources are included in the article, the claim that they exist is not enough to keep the article. Especially since "sources exist" in no way gaurantees that they are reliable, 3rd party secondary sources that give substantive coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Johnpacklambert, sources never need to be included in the article if we are evaluating it for notability standards at AfD. We need only show that they exist at all, see WP:NEXIST. Best practice would be to add found sources to the article, or lacking the time/inclination to do so, link them in the AfD discussion. If we haven't found any sources when doing WP:BEFORE, then absolutely, we can say the article should be deleted since no RS have turned up. Am I misreading that you are assuming there are no RS or are you sure there are none? Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Kartika Affandi-Koberl (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. From what I've found, most RS only mention subject in passing. Meatsgains ( talk) 03:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sources exist Sufficient sources exist to base an article on. I don't have access to all the sources, but AGF, I take it that Wright96, for example, is about the subject, and provides more than a passing mention. Mduvekot ( talk) 01:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete unless sources are included in the article, the claim that they exist is not enough to keep the article. Especially since "sources exist" in no way gaurantees that they are reliable, 3rd party secondary sources that give substantive coverage. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Johnpacklambert, sources never need to be included in the article if we are evaluating it for notability standards at AfD. We need only show that they exist at all, see WP:NEXIST. Best practice would be to add found sources to the article, or lacking the time/inclination to do so, link them in the AfD discussion. If we haven't found any sources when doing WP:BEFORE, then absolutely, we can say the article should be deleted since no RS have turned up. Am I misreading that you are assuming there are no RS or are you sure there are none? Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook