- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Karen DeSoto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Academic who does not appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Previously speedily deleted as spam as Karen desoto, but I don't think the current version is unambiguously spammy. bonadea contributions talk 10:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG. No articles about her. —Мандичка YO 😜 10:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Easy delete: no notability claims. Hithladaeus ( talk) 12:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 21:17, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
- Karen DeSoto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Academic who does not appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Previously speedily deleted as spam as Karen desoto, but I don't think the current version is unambiguously spammy. bonadea contributions talk 10:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG. No articles about her. —Мандичка YO 😜 10:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: Easy delete: no notability claims. Hithladaeus ( talk) 12:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.