- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Karaburun, Oğuzeli ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This mahalle fails GNG and lacks the legal recognition required by WP:GEOLAND. It's unclear whether this is even a distinct settlement as opposed to a larger rural area used for census purposes, as satellite views show what appears to be a cluster of farm buildings at this location. – dlthewave ☎ 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Turkey. – dlthewave ☎ 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The place is legally recognized and populated. Ayıntaplı ( talk) 06:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Bona fide but misguided nomination. This is a legally recognised place as evidenced by this list whereby it is clearly listed as having its own muhtar, and as such it is presumed notable per WP:GEOLAND. Please note that census-designated places or whatever are not a thing in Turkey, any place listed by TÜİK would necessarily have legal recognition. And also, satellite views to me show a small, scattered Turkish village - it's not uncommon at all to have houses scattered across a large area of land in conjunction with farmland. -- GGT ( talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Karaburun, Oğuzeli ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This mahalle fails GNG and lacks the legal recognition required by WP:GEOLAND. It's unclear whether this is even a distinct settlement as opposed to a larger rural area used for census purposes, as satellite views show what appears to be a cluster of farm buildings at this location. – dlthewave ☎ 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Turkey. – dlthewave ☎ 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The place is legally recognized and populated. Ayıntaplı ( talk) 06:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Bona fide but misguided nomination. This is a legally recognised place as evidenced by this list whereby it is clearly listed as having its own muhtar, and as such it is presumed notable per WP:GEOLAND. Please note that census-designated places or whatever are not a thing in Turkey, any place listed by TÜİK would necessarily have legal recognition. And also, satellite views to me show a small, scattered Turkish village - it's not uncommon at all to have houses scattered across a large area of land in conjunction with farmland. -- GGT ( talk) 17:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.