The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable television show. No coverage in reliable sources, article consists of unverified claims and Facebook links.
Drmies (
talk) 03:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The show is the leading magazine show in the country, and therefore I have added an citation because every article is required to atleast have one.
Angelo6397 (
talk) 05:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Right now the article's a bit of a mess, but a long-running (10+ years!) magazine show on a major television network, and which has won several awards (both local and foreign, to my recollection) is probably notable. Granted, most of the sources you'll probably find for the latter are non-independent ones, but the fact is, the show did win awards, which would probably by itself be enough to establish notability, while I remember seeing in one of our notability guidelines that shows that air nationwide on a nationwide network are generally notable.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 22:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - plenty of independent reliable sources around. This is like the Philippine version of
Inside Edition, that and
Rated K.--
RioHondo (
talk) 03:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable television show. No coverage in reliable sources, article consists of unverified claims and Facebook links.
Drmies (
talk) 03:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose: The show is the leading magazine show in the country, and therefore I have added an citation because every article is required to atleast have one.
Angelo6397 (
talk) 05:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Right now the article's a bit of a mess, but a long-running (10+ years!) magazine show on a major television network, and which has won several awards (both local and foreign, to my recollection) is probably notable. Granted, most of the sources you'll probably find for the latter are non-independent ones, but the fact is, the show did win awards, which would probably by itself be enough to establish notability, while I remember seeing in one of our notability guidelines that shows that air nationwide on a nationwide network are generally notable.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 22:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - plenty of independent reliable sources around. This is like the Philippine version of
Inside Edition, that and
Rated K.--
RioHondo (
talk) 03:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.