The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hello. You shouldn't delete the article because she is famous in korea and china. It was declined two times because of the sources, it was improperly sourced. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BeauSuzanne (
talk •
contribs)
08:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete this still doesn't explain Kang's lead or starring roles to meet
WP:ENT. The roles mentioned in the lead are not star billing, some are merely as guest stars and ntot even mentioned in the film/television series, so it is difficult to determine notability from there. The rest are bit roles. Editor was asked to supply
WP:THREE of the best sources but that was not done.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
11:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
She is well known in china and south korea she has articles on both sites, she has fans and is well known by people. I know she did supporting roles but there are other actors too who have done supporting roles too and are well known, they have articles, give it some time, it will improve in the future she may even get awards and nominations like the other actors. Lead role isn't everything. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BeauSuzanne (
talk •
contribs)
12:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
BeauSuzanne,
WP:ENT calls for significant roles in significant productions, and multiple ones. If her supporting role doesn't have star billing, it needs to be big enough so that it makes news that she is noted for being that role in other news articles. Look at
J. G. Hertzler's article. He's noted for portraying a supporting Star Trek: Deep Space Nine character, but many newspapers have written up articles about him. Is there a similar following for this person?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
14:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. A perfect example of
WP:BIAS. There are a plethora of sources in Korean, and I've added a bit of content just now. There are a countless number of sources available where Kang's 22-year career is subject to widespread coverage.
ƏXPLICIT12:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To allow further analysis of the sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jack Frost (
talk)
10:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Hello. You shouldn't delete the article because she is famous in korea and china. It was declined two times because of the sources, it was improperly sourced. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BeauSuzanne (
talk •
contribs)
08:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete this still doesn't explain Kang's lead or starring roles to meet
WP:ENT. The roles mentioned in the lead are not star billing, some are merely as guest stars and ntot even mentioned in the film/television series, so it is difficult to determine notability from there. The rest are bit roles. Editor was asked to supply
WP:THREE of the best sources but that was not done.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
11:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
She is well known in china and south korea she has articles on both sites, she has fans and is well known by people. I know she did supporting roles but there are other actors too who have done supporting roles too and are well known, they have articles, give it some time, it will improve in the future she may even get awards and nominations like the other actors. Lead role isn't everything. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BeauSuzanne (
talk •
contribs)
12:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
BeauSuzanne,
WP:ENT calls for significant roles in significant productions, and multiple ones. If her supporting role doesn't have star billing, it needs to be big enough so that it makes news that she is noted for being that role in other news articles. Look at
J. G. Hertzler's article. He's noted for portraying a supporting Star Trek: Deep Space Nine character, but many newspapers have written up articles about him. Is there a similar following for this person?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
14:19, 21 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. A perfect example of
WP:BIAS. There are a plethora of sources in Korean, and I've added a bit of content just now. There are a countless number of sources available where Kang's 22-year career is subject to widespread coverage.
ƏXPLICIT12:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To allow further analysis of the sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jack Frost (
talk)
10:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.