The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Question / comment: None of the links seems to be marked as dead. Did you look for them within web.archive.org? ¶ He's got
this at the Natural History Museum website,
an interview in something called the Economic Times, a
long interview in something called 6bridges, more. --
Hoary (
talk) 14:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. One interview in the Economic Times Business doesn't make someone notable.
Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call meHahc21 05:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. He's an award-winning person, having earned National History Museum Wildlife Photographer of the Year (per Hoary). Now, the references section needs some SERIOUS work because just putting the article link is not acceptable, and a few dead links should be fixed. But the article needs work, not deletion.
GRUcrule (
talk) 19:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, I think that the sources listed by
User:Hoary above are quite sufficient to push this past the
WP:GNG, in that they are independent and substantial.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 08:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete none of the awards appear to have got him in depth independent coverage in muliple sources. Maybe because the awards aren't that big a deal; I'm really not sure.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 11:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 06:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Question / comment: None of the links seems to be marked as dead. Did you look for them within web.archive.org? ¶ He's got
this at the Natural History Museum website,
an interview in something called the Economic Times, a
long interview in something called 6bridges, more. --
Hoary (
talk) 14:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG. One interview in the Economic Times Business doesn't make someone notable.
Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call meHahc21 05:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. He's an award-winning person, having earned National History Museum Wildlife Photographer of the Year (per Hoary). Now, the references section needs some SERIOUS work because just putting the article link is not acceptable, and a few dead links should be fixed. But the article needs work, not deletion.
GRUcrule (
talk) 19:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, I think that the sources listed by
User:Hoary above are quite sufficient to push this past the
WP:GNG, in that they are independent and substantial.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 08:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC).reply
Delete none of the awards appear to have got him in depth independent coverage in muliple sources. Maybe because the awards aren't that big a deal; I'm really not sure.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 11:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.