The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject of this article does not have widespread coverage outside one event. The event was not that important, and appears to fail
WP:BLP1E. No sources appear to exist to establish
WP:GNG. Some of the sources are articles that she wrote. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
16:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep While she definitely came onto the scene because of the initial event. Coverage has followed her since that event. I do agree with Muboshgu that it's pretty poorly sourced but a further search brought up enough sources from different events over the past year, including
the New York Post,
Yahoo,
The Cincinnati Enquirer, and
Newsweek. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
18:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep clearly meets the GNG as per Newsweek, NY Times, Cincinnati Enquirer, Salon. She has multiple sources about several topics over an extended period of time so keep!
Ndołkah (
talk)
00:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - As far as I can tell, she has ben covered in a scant few news articles because of the AR-10 stunt, and then she sought more attention by performing a couple of other stunts like drinking milk and trying to ambush Chasten Buttigieg by asking a bizarre question. The article is classic
WP:BIO1E. There is no evidence that her attention seeking will have any
lasting effect, and there doesn't seem to anything else of biographical value available around which to write a proper biography.-
MrX 🖋
02:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, unfortunately. I may disagree with Mrs. Bennett's politics, and her personal stunts, but (contrary to popular belief) Wikipedia is not a venue for the airing of such grievances. She easily meets GNG and will likely continue to do so, given her affiliation with the inflammatory
Infowars and penchant for media-savvy political stunts. We have to be fair and equal. --
Shibbolethink(
♔♕)18:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject of this article does not have widespread coverage outside one event. The event was not that important, and appears to fail
WP:BLP1E. No sources appear to exist to establish
WP:GNG. Some of the sources are articles that she wrote. –
Muboshgu (
talk)
16:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep While she definitely came onto the scene because of the initial event. Coverage has followed her since that event. I do agree with Muboshgu that it's pretty poorly sourced but a further search brought up enough sources from different events over the past year, including
the New York Post,
Yahoo,
The Cincinnati Enquirer, and
Newsweek. Best,
GPL93 (
talk)
18:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep clearly meets the GNG as per Newsweek, NY Times, Cincinnati Enquirer, Salon. She has multiple sources about several topics over an extended period of time so keep!
Ndołkah (
talk)
00:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - As far as I can tell, she has ben covered in a scant few news articles because of the AR-10 stunt, and then she sought more attention by performing a couple of other stunts like drinking milk and trying to ambush Chasten Buttigieg by asking a bizarre question. The article is classic
WP:BIO1E. There is no evidence that her attention seeking will have any
lasting effect, and there doesn't seem to anything else of biographical value available around which to write a proper biography.-
MrX 🖋
02:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep, unfortunately. I may disagree with Mrs. Bennett's politics, and her personal stunts, but (contrary to popular belief) Wikipedia is not a venue for the airing of such grievances. She easily meets GNG and will likely continue to do so, given her affiliation with the inflammatory
Infowars and penchant for media-savvy political stunts. We have to be fair and equal. --
Shibbolethink(
♔♕)18:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.