- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- KCDIY ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Have been marked for notability since early 2009 and no info on it either has been there since. Wgolf ( talk) 00:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet WP:WEB guidelines for notability. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly not notable per nom. and above comment. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 02:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable per nom, and the website has nothing on it currently. Upjav ( talk) 18:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Patently fails WP:WEB, and as Upjav points out, the site's dead (Internet Archive indicates it went down sometime in late 2010/early 2011). While the site being dead doesn't preclude notability, in this case it's just icing on the cake. Even the forum doesn't appear to have ever been all that active (largest board had fewer than 500 threads in June 2010). It might've been a niche website of local interest several years ago... but that's all it ever was. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 01:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- KCDIY ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Have been marked for notability since early 2009 and no info on it either has been there since. Wgolf ( talk) 00:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet WP:WEB guidelines for notability. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 00:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly not notable per nom. and above comment. -- Jersey92 ( talk) 02:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable per nom, and the website has nothing on it currently. Upjav ( talk) 18:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Patently fails WP:WEB, and as Upjav points out, the site's dead (Internet Archive indicates it went down sometime in late 2010/early 2011). While the site being dead doesn't preclude notability, in this case it's just icing on the cake. Even the forum doesn't appear to have ever been all that active (largest board had fewer than 500 threads in June 2010). It might've been a niche website of local interest several years ago... but that's all it ever was. —/ Mendaliv/ 2¢/ Δ's/ 01:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.