The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Stifle (
talk) 14:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Neutral leaning towards Weak keep. No opinion on this yet, but I have several things to note: (1) According to
this there were apparently a total of 19 theatres across the life of the chain. (2) The actual name seems to have been K-B Theatres, with a hyphen (3) The Washington Post
referred to it as the area's largest theatre chain, as of 1980... and the DC area is obviously a pretty major market.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep according to a reliable, verifiable source they are notable, the fact that it was published in 1980 is irrelevant given that
Notability is not temporary.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Stifle (
talk) 14:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Neutral leaning towards Weak keep. No opinion on this yet, but I have several things to note: (1) According to
this there were apparently a total of 19 theatres across the life of the chain. (2) The actual name seems to have been K-B Theatres, with a hyphen (3) The Washington Post
referred to it as the area's largest theatre chain, as of 1980... and the DC area is obviously a pretty major market.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep according to a reliable, verifiable source they are notable, the fact that it was published in 1980 is irrelevant given that
Notability is not temporary.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.