The result was delete. BD2412 T 19:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This is a translator station that isn't even in operation anymore. The only sources are fcc filings, giving it zero notability. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
*Keep: As this station was sold to Regal Media and wasn't owned by TBN at the time it signed off, redirection to the
List of TBN Affiliates would be incorrect. Declaring this "just another TBN translator" shows that folks, with all due respect to my fellow editor above, haven't even looked at the article. To
Rusf10, the article has 4 references on it. FCC filings are references from a highly notable source, we need to stop acting like they aren't. Presumed notability is indeed extended. An FCC license has been enough for many, many years over at WPRS and had been enough at TVS. Again, with all due respect to
Wcquidditch, I respectfully disagree. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 06:55 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)
:::Um, who's been here for almost 16 years, has multiple GAs and an FA under his belt? Yeah, that'd be me....I know what a damned primary source is, ya damned fool! YOU still have missed the point, it wasn't a TBN translator because it wasn't owned by TBN. It was owned by Regal Media. Can't redirect it to List of TBN affiliates when it wasn't owned by TBN or broadcasting TBN programming, now can we? Also, exactly where does it say that a US federal government source isn't "highly notable"? Federal Government sources (ie: anything .gov, anything .mil) is considered HIGHLY reliable under RS. Always has. Not sure where you've been. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 07:51 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)
:*I actually would be OK with this. :) -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 20:32 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. BD2412 T 19:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This is a translator station that isn't even in operation anymore. The only sources are fcc filings, giving it zero notability. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
*Keep: As this station was sold to Regal Media and wasn't owned by TBN at the time it signed off, redirection to the
List of TBN Affiliates would be incorrect. Declaring this "just another TBN translator" shows that folks, with all due respect to my fellow editor above, haven't even looked at the article. To
Rusf10, the article has 4 references on it. FCC filings are references from a highly notable source, we need to stop acting like they aren't. Presumed notability is indeed extended. An FCC license has been enough for many, many years over at WPRS and had been enough at TVS. Again, with all due respect to
Wcquidditch, I respectfully disagree. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 06:55 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)
:::Um, who's been here for almost 16 years, has multiple GAs and an FA under his belt? Yeah, that'd be me....I know what a damned primary source is, ya damned fool! YOU still have missed the point, it wasn't a TBN translator because it wasn't owned by TBN. It was owned by Regal Media. Can't redirect it to List of TBN affiliates when it wasn't owned by TBN or broadcasting TBN programming, now can we? Also, exactly where does it say that a US federal government source isn't "highly notable"? Federal Government sources (ie: anything .gov, anything .mil) is considered HIGHLY reliable under RS. Always has. Not sure where you've been. -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 07:51 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)
:*I actually would be OK with this. :) -
Neutralhomer •
Talk • 20:32 on March 28, 2021 (UTC)