The result was nomination withdrawn. The only editor who commented in favour of deletion has changed his !vote to "weak keep", and the nominator has stated that he wishes to withdraw. ( non-admin closure) Intelligent sium 02:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An attempt it made on the talk page to address the criteria of WP:PROF, but they fail to pass muster. Previous deletion discussions have suggested that Principals of theological colleges are not inherently notable. StAnselm ( talk) 08:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. The only editor who commented in favour of deletion has changed his !vote to "weak keep", and the nominator has stated that he wishes to withdraw. ( non-admin closure) Intelligent sium 02:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An attempt it made on the talk page to address the criteria of WP:PROF, but they fail to pass muster. Previous deletion discussions have suggested that Principals of theological colleges are not inherently notable. StAnselm ( talk) 08:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply