The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The article is riddled with original research and in fact unsourced research. There is no reason for a surname to be notable - especially when the substantially questionable claims are historic and not backed by secondary sources. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 19:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The article is riddled with original research and in fact unsourced research. There is no reason for a surname to be notable - especially when the substantially questionable claims are historic and not backed by secondary sources. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ ―Œ ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 19:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC) reply