- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Generally, when content is merged into another article, the original article is redirected to the destination article, which is an action that does not require a deletion discussion. As no editor here has advanced a well-substantiated argument for deletion, I see "keep" as the outcome. Mz7 ( talk) 22:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Juggalo March
- Juggalo March ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't warrant it's own article, info should be merged into main ICP article. RF23 ( talk) 13:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 14:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 14:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is incumbent on the proposer to name a notability criterion and why the article fails. E.g. could you explain why WP:NEVENT is not met, "having widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources"? We have in this article several items from the national newspaper of record and the premier national politicsl events newspaper, plus a national television network, so it seems to me to qualify. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per GNG (disclaimer: article creator). The Juggalo March was held on the same day as the Mother of All Rallies, and both received significant press coverage. There are many sources that could be used to expand the current article, which should mention the march's purpose (to protest the FBI's classification of Juggalos as a gang), activities, planning, the number of attendees, etc. One can easily establish notability simply by searching "Juggalo March" at Google News. Even if this topic weren't eligible for a standalone entry, a redirect or merge would be more appropriate than deleting altogether. With a bit of background info, logistical details, and commentary, this article could easily make a great addition to Wikipedia. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article may need mention in the Insane Clown Posse article but the present article goes into much more depth (and has the sources for it) than would be possible as part of a larger article. I see no need for the merge and a likely detriment. The event seems notable in its own right. -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 12:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Include information in main Juggalo page
Martinlc (
talk) 13:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting there is not enough coverage to justify a standalone article, or do you have a general preference for merging content? If you could provide a rationale, that'd be helpful. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Generally, when content is merged into another article, the original article is redirected to the destination article, which is an action that does not require a deletion discussion. As no editor here has advanced a well-substantiated argument for deletion, I see "keep" as the outcome. Mz7 ( talk) 22:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Juggalo March
- Juggalo March ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't warrant it's own article, info should be merged into main ICP article. RF23 ( talk) 13:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 14:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 14:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is incumbent on the proposer to name a notability criterion and why the article fails. E.g. could you explain why WP:NEVENT is not met, "having widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources"? We have in this article several items from the national newspaper of record and the premier national politicsl events newspaper, plus a national television network, so it seems to me to qualify. ☆ Bri ( talk) 16:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per GNG (disclaimer: article creator). The Juggalo March was held on the same day as the Mother of All Rallies, and both received significant press coverage. There are many sources that could be used to expand the current article, which should mention the march's purpose (to protest the FBI's classification of Juggalos as a gang), activities, planning, the number of attendees, etc. One can easily establish notability simply by searching "Juggalo March" at Google News. Even if this topic weren't eligible for a standalone entry, a redirect or merge would be more appropriate than deleting altogether. With a bit of background info, logistical details, and commentary, this article could easily make a great addition to Wikipedia. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article may need mention in the Insane Clown Posse article but the present article goes into much more depth (and has the sources for it) than would be possible as part of a larger article. I see no need for the merge and a likely detriment. The event seems notable in its own right. -- TeaDrinker ( talk) 12:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Include information in main Juggalo page
Martinlc (
talk) 13:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting there is not enough coverage to justify a standalone article, or do you have a general preference for merging content? If you could provide a rationale, that'd be helpful. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.